I first read Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale in July of 1992. It was the summer before my
senior year in high school. Along with reading, my diary recounts days spent
babysitting my two-year-old sister, practicing piano and typing, making dinner
using a new-fangled product called Boboli, taking tennis lessons, listening to
Janis Joplin, and accompanying my mother to her doctor appointments for the
baby due that August.
My 17-year-old assessment of the book? “Very, very
creepy. It seems almost possible.”
My 42-year-old assessment? “Very, very creepy. It seems almost possible.”
Using my new-fangled Kindle, I highlighted the
following as plausible:
“It was after the catastrophe, when they shot the
president and machine-gunned the Congress and the army declared a state of
emergency. They blamed it on the Islamic fanatics, at the time. Keep calm, they
said on television. Everything is under control.”
“Better? I say, in a small voice. How can he think
this is better? Better never means better for everyone, he says. It always
means worse, for some.”
“As the architects of Gilead knew, to institute an
effective totalitarian system or indeed any system at all you must offer some
benefits and freedoms, at least to a privileged few, in return for those you
remove.”
1 comment:
Seems frighteningly possible.
Post a Comment